How Can The Intelligent Deem The Sa'aafiqah Truthful?

A glimpse Into Their Deception And Double Standards

Feb 12, 2025

How Can The Intelligent Deem The Sa'aafiqah Truthful? (A glimpse Into Their Deception And Double Standards)

When Sheikh Ubayd criticized some of the Salafi Mashaayikh with points of criticism that were void of any evidence, -consequently causing- Sheikh Rabee to respond to these criticisms, what -at that point- was the position of the Sa'aafiqah, the trouble makers of Aden, the Sa'aafiqah of Libya, and the mafia of trouble making and or dissension sowing in the eastern and western hemisphere?

There position was as follows:

Acceptance of the criticism.
The absence of demand for proof related to the criticism.
Falsely accusing whoever requested proof of revilement of Sheikh Ubayd.
Falsely accusing whoever spread the speech of Sheikh Rabee of desiring the sowing of dissension between the two.
Testing Salafis by way of this criticism.
Describing whoever accepted the criticism as being strong in Minhaj, and whoever rejected it as being weak in that regard.

The End Result: Division among Salafis, the manifestation of revilement of Sheikh Rabee from the direction of some of the Sa'aafiqah, describing Sheikh Ubayd with being stronger in Minhaj than Sheikh Rabee, the manifestation of some people who -began- revilement of Sheikh Ubayd along with the Sa'aafiqah taking advantage of that in order to revile Salafi Mashaayikh alleging that they revile Sheikh Ubayd.

But when Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi criticized the Sa'aafiqah, and warned against them, what was the stance of the Sa'aafiqah, the troublemakers of Aden, the Sa'aafiqah of Libya, and the mafia of trouble making and or dissension sowing throughout the eastern and western hemisphere?

Rejection of the criticism along with circulation of Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd's praise for the criticized among the Sa'aafiqah.
Request for evidence concerning the criticism and making it a foundation after previously combating it.
Making ineffective all the proofs related to the criticism and -alleging- it's nonexistence.
Falsely accusing whoever manifested proofs with revilement of Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd.
Falsely accusing whoever circulated the speech of Sheikh Muhammad with revilement of Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd.
Testing Salafis by way of that praise along with revilement of whomever rejected it, or remained neutral (in this issue).
Describing whoever accepted the praise as being strong in minhaj whereas whoever rejected it is weak in that regard.
Explicit revilement of Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi along with striving for his downfall and everyone who defends him as well.

The End Result: Division among the Salafis, manifestation of revilement of Salafi Mashaayikh from the direction of the Sa'aafiqah and their mob/gang e.g. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Haadi, Sheikh Muhammad ibn Ali Ferkous, Sheikh Sulaiman Ar Ruhayli, and Sheikh Abdul Majid Jumu'a (and that's just the tip of the iceberg), and an abundance of people becoming bold/defiant with Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd due to their lack of awareness concerning the plots and schemes of the Sa'aafiqah along with the Sa'aafiqah taking advantage of this in order to accuse the Salafis of revilement of Sheikh Rabee and Sheikh Ubayd.

This is an accurate summary of the Sa'aafiqah and their trouble making.